Two colleagues reviewing portfolio technology costs on a laptop dashboard showing licence spend across commerce, order management and warehouse systems

Cut your portfolio's technology run-rate

Fynd replaces fragmented retail technology estates with a single platform covering commerce, order management, warehouse, stores, and sourcing. Deployed by our own engineers and priced for the hold period. The saving drops to EBITDA and carries into the exit multiple

2 to 3 weeks

estate and cost mapping

1 contract

one renewal date, one vendor

0

systems integrators involved

2 to 3 weeks

estate and cost mapping

The diagnostic offer

Audit the tech stack, calculate the savings

Under NDA, we map a portfolio company's full technology estate in two to three weeks. Every licence, renewal date, escalation clause, integrator fee, and support contract. The output is two figures: current annual technology run-rate, and the run-rate on a consolidated stack. You decide with the numbers in front of you. The same mapping runs during exclusivity on a live deal, so the savings case sits in the model before you sign

  1. 1.NDA and introduction to the CTO or deal team
  2. 2.Estate and cost mapping, two to three weeks
  3. 3.Savings case with module-by-module sequencing and timeline
A CTO reviewing a laptop, with a floating card showing current technology run-rate versus the consolidated-stack savings case
A chart showing modules replaced in order of cash released, from first the module releasing the most complexity through to remaining modules, plotted against a deployment-start to exit-ready timeline
How the replacement works

Sequenced by cash released, not by architecture

We replace modules in the order that frees the most cost soonest. Implementation runs on forward deployed architects who work from the retailer's own offices. There is no systems integrator between you and the people building. One contract, one renewal date, one accountable vendor across the estate. Timelines are set against your hold period, not a multi-year programme plan. Each module cuts over with the old system running alongside until the numbers reconcile, so trading carries on while the estate changes underneath it

Where it fits

Not every asset is a turnaround

The platform and the diagnostic are the same in every case. What changes is the sequencing and the contract

Turnaround

Cost takeout on a compressed timeline. The most expensive modules go first, so the saving lands early in the hold

Carve-out

A retailer leaving its parent needs a full stack before the TSAs expire. One vendor stands it up, without a dozen new contracts to negotiate

Buy-and-build

Bolt-ons land on the stack the platform asset already runs. Integration gets cheaper with each acquisition, and the group exits as one business

Vertically integrated retail

For businesses that make what they sell: one vendor for their Plan > Make > Move > Sell journey

Proof at scale

Built inside the largest retailer in India

Fynd has been part of Reliance Retail since 2019 and replatformed its core commerce estate. Over the last 14 years the platform has been deployed across major global retailers upgrading their technology stack while bringing down the cost.

$2.5B

annual platform GMV

300M+

customers served

14 years

revolutionising commerce

11

countries with deployments

Exit readiness

A stack the buyer can price

Fragmented estates get discounted in diligence because nobody can say what they cost or what happens to the licences on sale. Fynd leaves one contract, one renewal date, and an audited run-rate in the data room. A buyer's team can read the technology position in one go.

  1. 1.One contract, one renewal date
  2. 2.An audited technology run-rate for the data room
  3. 3.Licence terms checked for change-of-control clauses during the diagnostic
Two colleagues reviewing a screen, with a floating card listing the technology position: one contract, one renewal date, audited annual run-rate, module map of the estate, read in one go
A senior executive and colleague reviewing a tablet together
Portfolio commercial model

One agreement, every asset

A single master agreement with the fund, with drawdown statements of work per portfolio company. For each portfolio company, the first deployment carries the diligence cost; the second and third do not. Savings cases are stated as committed percentages against audited run-rate, reviewed at each drawdown

Built for businesses like yours. Let’s connect

  1. 1

    Fill out the form

    Share your contact information to get started

  2. 2

    Speak to an expert

    A member of our sales team will get in touch with you

Get in touch

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.